Skip to content
World edition
Analyst Newspaper
World · Multi-perspective analysis

A year after Gaza ceasefire, strikes and stalemate persist, reports say

A year after the US-backed ceasefire took effect, outlets across regions agree that fighting, displacement and stalled reconstruction persist in Gaza, though they differ sharply in how they describe responsibility and the scale of continued Israeli military action.

Analysis deskEditor Andersson Iyke
14 outlets, 7 regions

What happened

One year after a US-backed ceasefire took effect in Gaza on October 10, 2025, multiple outlets report that Israeli air strikes and military operations continue, causing ongoing deaths despite the formal truce.121314

Outlets across regions describe Trump's broader plan to end the war as stalled, with Hamas still armed, Israeli forces holding large parts of the territory, and reconstruction barely underway.6891314

Humanitarian conditions remain severe, with the WHO citing overwhelming health needs for nearly 2 million people and thousands of children reported by Gaza's Hamas-run Health Ministry as awaiting medical evacuation.410

Photographic and on-the-ground reporting shows Gaza's urban landscape transformed by three years of war, with residents described as living amid devastation and in cramped tent cities.5811

What's agreed

Reported consistently by outlets in more than one region.

  • A year after the ceasefire took hold, Trump's broader plan to end the Gaza war remains stalled, with reconstruction barely underway.6891314
  • Israeli forces continue military operations and strikes in Gaza despite the ceasefire, which continue to cause deaths.389121314
  • Conditions for Palestinians in Gaza remain dire, with many still living in tent cities and reconstruction blocked.681314
  • Israeli forces continue to hold or occupy a large share of Gaza territory.91314
  • Three years of war have dramatically transformed Gaza's physical landscape.511

Where accounts differ

Each account is attributed to who makes it. We do not judge between them.

Extent of Israeli territorial control in Gaza

Agência Brasil

Israel maintains 60% of Palestinian territory occupied, according to the outlet's reporting.9

Arab News and Jerusalem Post

Israel is occupying around two-thirds of Gaza, described as holding most of the enclave.1314

Characterization of Israeli military activity since the ceasefire

Financial Times

Describes Israeli operations as a relentless military campaign under a 'scorched-earth' ceasefire.3

Arab News and Jerusalem Post

Describe near-daily Israeli attacks and fire continuing, with Hamas still armed.1314

BBC News

Reports daily killing of Palestinians despite the ceasefire, per local accounts.8

Responsibility for the stalled peace process

RT, Russian state media

Frames the situation as Netanyahu's military gains failing to secure Israel's future, leaving the region in turmoil.2

CNA

Attributes the stalemate to analysts citing differences over disarmament, Israeli withdrawal and Palestinian statehood, without assigning blame to one side.7

Jerusalem Post

Frames the stall partly around Hamas remaining armed, alongside Israeli forces holding most of Gaza.14

How it's framed

What each perspective puts first, based on headlines and summaries.

PerspectiveHow it readsWhat it puts first
Chinese and Russian state mediaEast AsiaEmphasize failure of the ceasefire to produce genuine peace and frame Israeli and US-backed efforts as unsuccessful or destabilizing.12prolonged stalemate, Netanyahu's gains have not secured Israel's future, regional turmoil
Middle East outletsMiddle East & TurkeyQatari, Turkish, Saudi and Israeli outlets detail specific terms of the stalled plan, including disarmament, territorial control and humanitarian needs, with Al Jazeera emphasizing visual transformation and Anadolu highlighting WHO humanitarian warnings.5101314near-daily attacks, occupation of two-thirds of Gaza, Hamas still armed, overwhelming health needs, unrecognisable urban landscape
Western outlets (US and European)North AmericaUS and European coverage focuses on bleak humanitarian conditions, blocked reconstruction, and Netanyahu's domestic political position, often using strong descriptive language about destruction.36811war-ravaged, frozen in misery, scorched-earth, stalled US plan, tent cities
Latin American outletsLatin AmericaBrazilian and Uruguayan outlets emphasize ongoing civilian harm, citing UN humanitarian data and specific figures such as children awaiting medical evacuation and daily bombing reports.4912daily bombings, UN humanitarian office findings, children awaiting evacuation, peace plan failing to advance
Southeast Asian state mediaSoutheast AsiaCNA offers an analytical, relatively neutral framing centered on structural obstacles identified by unnamed analysts rather than attributing blame.7disarmament disputes, Israeli withdrawal, Palestinian statehood, elusive peace

What the coverage leaves out

  • None of the outlets reviewed reported detailed casualty figures from the past year of continued strikes, only that deaths continue.
  • None of the outlets reviewed reported the Israeli government's official response to allegations of continued strikes or occupation figures.
  • None of the outlets reviewed reported Hamas's official position on disarmament or its current military status in detail beyond being described as 'still armed.'
  • None of the outlets reviewed provided a detailed account of mediators' (US, Qatar, Egypt) current diplomatic efforts to revive the stalled plan.

Why it matters

The ceasefire followed Hamas's October 7, 2023 attack on Israel, which killed around 1,200 people and saw 251 taken hostage, triggering the war; the ceasefire's initial phase secured release of the last hostages and freedom for hundreds of Palestinian prisoners.413

Analysts cite unresolved differences over disarmament, Israeli withdrawal and Palestinian statehood as factors blocking further progress.7

What to watch

  • Whether disputes over Hamas disarmament, Israeli withdrawal and Palestinian statehood are resolved, as cited by analysts as the core obstacles to progress (S7).
  • Whether reconstruction efforts in Gaza move forward, which multiple outlets report has barely started (S6, S14).

Sources (14)

Every outlet we drew on, grouped by where it is based. Read the originals for the full reporting.

Latin America

East Asia

Southeast Asia

Get every side of the day's news.

Join the list for our daily briefing, launching soon.