Skip to content
World edition
Analyst Newspaper
World · Multi-perspective analysis

Countries expand biometric and AI tools to monitor asylum seekers, migrants

Four countries are reported to be deploying biometric or AI-based systems to monitor asylum seekers and foreign nationals, with South Africa and Malaysia announcing new systems while the UK faces criticism over existing AI tools.

Analysis deskEditor Andersson Iyke
4 outlets, 3 regions

What happened

South Africa's Home Affairs department plans to introduce a biometric system for asylum seekers, which it says will prevent abuse of the asylum system.1

The UK's Home Office has deployed an AI system for asylum processing that ministers said would speed up decisions, but campaigners say the technology is making mistakes and that processing times have worsened, with reports that it fails one in five accuracy checks.2

Indonesia's immigration agency is expanding digital monitoring of foreign nationals and refugees.3

Malaysia's Home Ministry is developing an AI-based National Border Control System intended to strengthen surveillance.4

What's agreed

Reported consistently by outlets in more than one region.

  • Several governments are introducing or expanding digital and AI-based technology to monitor asylum seekers, refugees and foreign nationals, including biometric systems and AI border control tools.134

Where accounts differ

Each account is attributed to who makes it. We do not judge between them.

Effectiveness of AI/biometric systems in asylum and immigration processing

UK Home Office, as reported by The Register

Ministers promised the AI system would speed up asylum decisions.2

Campaigners, as cited by The Register

Campaigners say the technology is making mistakes and that asylum processing times have gotten worse, with the AI reportedly failing one in five accuracy checks.2

How it's framed

What each perspective puts first, based on headlines and summaries.

PerspectiveHow it readsWhat it puts first
South African public broadcasterAfricaReports the planned biometric system in neutral terms, framing it as a measure to prevent abuse of the asylum system, per Home Affairs.1preventing system abuse, new biometric technology
UK privately owned tech-focused outletEuropeTakes a critical tone toward an already-implemented AI asylum system, emphasizing accuracy failures and worsening processing times despite government promises.2accuracy failures, worsening processing times, gap between promises and results
Indonesian state-controlled outletSoutheast AsiaReports expansion of digital immigration monitoring in neutral, factual terms without critical framing.3expanding monitoring capability, foreign nationals and refugees
Malaysian privately owned outletSoutheast AsiaReports development of an AI-based border control system in neutral terms, citing the Home Ministry's stated aim to strengthen surveillance.4AI-based system development, strengthening surveillance

What the coverage leaves out

  • None of the outlets reviewed reported specific timelines, costs, or technical details for the South African, Indonesian, or Malaysian systems.
  • None of the outlets reviewed reported how asylum seekers or refugee advocacy groups in South Africa, Indonesia, or Malaysia view these new systems.
  • None of the outlets reviewed reported the specific error rate findings or methodology behind the UK AI system's reported accuracy failures.
  • None of the outlets reviewed reported whether South Africa, Indonesia, or Malaysia's systems have faced accuracy or implementation problems similar to those reported in the UK.

Why it matters

Governments frame these technologies as tools to manage migration and prevent abuse of asylum and immigration systems, while critics in at least one country report accuracy problems with such systems.124

Sources (4)

Every outlet we drew on, grouped by where it is based. Read the originals for the full reporting.

Get every side of the day's news.

Join the list for our daily briefing, launching soon.