Skip to content
World edition
Analyst Newspaper
World · Multi-perspective analysis

US completes withdrawal of troops from Iraq after decades-long presence

The US has ended its military mission in Iraq after more than two decades, drawing celebration from Baghdad and Iran-aligned factions but also warnings that a security vacuum could benefit the Islamic State group or Iran-backed militias.

Analysis deskEditor Andersson Iyke
24 outlets, 9 regions

What happened

The United States has formally completed the withdrawal of its remaining troops from Iraq, according to the Pentagon and Iraqi officials.1469

The withdrawal follows a 2024 agreement between Washington and Baghdad and concludes what outlets describe variously as a 12-year anti-Islamic State mission or a more than two-decade US military presence dating to the 2003 invasion.8121521

Iraqi leaders and Iran-aligned factions have celebrated the departure, framing it as a victory and a step toward renewed Iraqi sovereignty, while some Iraqi security experts and other observers warn of risks including a security vacuum, a resurgent Islamic State, and emboldened Iran-backed militias.24161720

The last US and UK troops departed from an air base in northern Iraq, with the US relocating its regional headquarters to Jordan.121424

What's agreed

Reported consistently by outlets in more than one region.

  • The United States has completed the withdrawal of its remaining troops from Iraq, ending its military mission there.1469121324
  • The withdrawal follows a deal agreed between Washington and Baghdad in 2024.81218
  • The mission being concluded was originally a US-led coalition effort against the Islamic State group, which began around 2014.28724
  • Iran and allied factions in Iraq have celebrated the withdrawal as a victory.4161822
  • There are concerns that the withdrawal could allow Islamic State remnants to regroup or embolden Iran-backed militias.241719
  • Iraqi leaders have celebrated the withdrawal as a moment of renewed sovereignty.2820

Where accounts differ

Each account is attributed to who makes it. We do not judge between them.

How the withdrawal will affect security in Iraq

Iraqi government and Baghdad officials, per SCMP, Dawn, Jerusalem Post

The withdrawal is celebrated as a step toward renewed Iraqi sovereignty.2820

Iraqi security experts, cited by The Guardian

The withdrawal could give the Islamic State and other groups a chance to recover.4

Unnamed analysts/commentary, cited by SCMP, Daily Maverick, Japan Times, Rappler

The withdrawal risks emboldening pro-Iran armed factions and a resurgent Islamic State group.2171823

Kurds in Iraq, per ABC News Australia

Concern about the implications of the US withdrawal for their region.7

How many years of US mission this withdrawal ends

Outlets citing the 2014 anti-ISIS coalition mission (SCMP, Dawn, ABC Australia, France24, Fox News)

The withdrawal ends a roughly 12-year mission that began in 2014 to fight the Islamic State group.2781424

Outlets citing the 2003 invasion (The Hindu, NYT, Al Jazeera, FT)

The withdrawal ends more than two decades (20-23 years) of US military involvement in Iraq dating to the 2003 invasion.15211319

How it's framed

What each perspective puts first, based on headlines and summaries.

PerspectiveHow it readsWhat it puts first
US and allied outlets focusing on operational and political framingNorth AmericaUS outlets emphasize the formal Pentagon announcement, the operational details of the withdrawal, and domestic political context, including Trump administration involvement.61421Pentagon completion, Operation Inherent Resolve, relocation to Jordan, Trump's role
Middle Eastern outlets emphasizing sovereignty and regional power dynamicsMiddle East & TurkeyOutlets from the region highlight Iraqi framing of the withdrawal as a sovereignty milestone, alongside skepticism about Iraq's earlier requests for US help and Iran's regional influence.51320sovereignty, renewed independence, irony of prior requests for help, Iran's role
European public broadcasters and financial press noting historical arc and security riskEuropeEuropean outlets frame the withdrawal within the longer historical arc of US involvement since 2003, and note ongoing competition for influence among Iran-backed militias.4121924two decades of involvement, deal agreed two years prior, Iran-backed militias, mixed Iraqi reactions
State-controlled outlets framing the exit as an expected transition of responsibilityRussia & EurasiaRussian state media frames the withdrawal as an orderly conclusion of a declared operation, with US expectations placed on Iraq to independently manage its own security.3operation concludes as planned, Iraq to handle IS remnants independently
Qatari state-controlled outlet emphasizing historical scope of interventionMiddle East & TurkeyAl Jazeera frames the withdrawal as ending two decades of foreign intervention tied to the broader "war on terror" narrative.13two decades of intervention, global war on terror framing
South and Southeast Asian outlets highlighting economic leverage and historical costsSouth AsiaOutlets in this region focus on the human and financial costs of the war and continued US financial leverage over Iraq via oil revenue mechanisms even after troop withdrawal.1622US control of oil revenues, American casualties, leverage over Baghdad
African and independent outlets emphasizing security vacuum riskAfricaAfrican outlets, some via syndicated wire copy, emphasize fears of a security vacuum benefiting Iran-backed militias and Islamic State remnants.117security vacuum, Iran-backed militias emboldened, Islamic State resurgence risk
East and Southeast Asian outlets emphasizing factual completion and celebrationEast AsiaOutlets in this region present a largely factual account of the mission's conclusion, noting celebration by Iraqi leaders alongside concerns about pro-Iran factions.21118mission conclusion, Iraqi leader celebration, fears over pro-Iran factions

What the coverage leaves out

  • None of the outlets reviewed detailed what specific US military assets or personnel numbers remained in Iraq immediately prior to this final withdrawal.
  • None of the outlets reviewed reported the Islamic State group's own response or statements regarding the withdrawal.
  • None of the outlets reviewed provided details on what replacement security arrangements, if any, Iraq has put in place to manage the transition.
  • None of the outlets reviewed reported reactions from other regional governments beyond Iraq and Iran-aligned factions.

Why it matters

The withdrawal marks the end of a US military presence in Iraq that began with the 2003 invasion, over two decades ago, and included a later coalition mission against the Islamic State group starting in 2014.1519212

According to The Straits Times and The Economic Times, roughly 4,500 Americans died during more than two decades of war in Iraq.1622

What to watch

  • Whether Iraq's security forces can independently manage any resurgence of Islamic State remnants, as anticipated by Washington according to TASS.
  • Whether Iran-backed militias increase their influence in Iraq following the US departure, as flagged by the Financial Times and others.
  • How Kurdish authorities in northern Iraq respond to the changed security posture, per ABC News Australia.

Sources (24)

Every outlet we drew on, grouped by where it is based. Read the originals for the full reporting.

Oceania

Get every side of the day's news.

Join the list for our daily briefing, launching soon.