Skip to content
World edition
Analyst Newspaper
Politics · Multi-perspective analysis

EU removes oligarchs Usmanov and Fridman from Russia sanctions list

The EU delisted two Russian billionaires while extending the wider sanctions regime, in a compromise reached under deadline pressure that Ukraine and some critics call a bad precedent.

Analysis deskEditor Andersson Iyke
9 outlets, 2 regions

What happened

The EU agreed to remove Russian billionaires Alisher Usmanov and Mikhail Fridman from its sanctions list, while extending restrictions on nearly 3,000 other individuals and companies linked to Russia's war in Ukraine for another three years.4893

The decision came after difficult negotiations, as EU sanctions require unanimous approval from all 27 member states, with an end-of-Tuesday deadline looming to preserve the wider Russia blacklist.48

Ireland's EU presidency described the outcome as 'a difficult compromise' for the bloc.8

Kyiv criticized the delisting, with reports describing the move as 'shameful and unjustifiable' and warning it sends Moscow the wrong signals.56

What's agreed

Reported consistently by outlets in more than one region.

  • The EU removed Alisher Usmanov and Mikhail Fridman from its Russia sanctions list.123456789
  • The EU extended sanctions on roughly 3,000 other individuals and entities linked to Russia's war in Ukraine for another three years.3489
  • Reaching the decision required unanimous agreement among EU member states and followed difficult negotiations.48

Where accounts differ

Each account is attributed to who makes it. We do not judge between them.

Which countries drove the push to delist the two oligarchs

RT, citing a France-Latvia dispute

A feud between France and Latvia over Usmanov's status preceded the delisting.1

Deutsche Welle

France and Luxembourg were behind the sanctions exemptions for Usmanov and Fridman.5

Latvian PM Andris Kulbergs, via Ukrainska Pravda

Latvia was the only EU country to oppose lifting the sanctions on Usmanov and Fridman.2

Level of support among EU member states for delisting

The Guardian, citing Ireland's EU presidency

The 27 member states reached a compromise to delist the two oligarchs despite very few countries wanting this outcome.8

Ukrainska Pravda, citing Latvian PM Kulbergs

Latvia alone formally opposed the move, implying broader acceptance among other states.2

How it's framed

What each perspective puts first, based on headlines and summaries.

PerspectiveHow it readsWhat it puts first
Russian state mediaRussia & EurasiaCoverage frames the story around internal EU disagreement and procedural friction, presenting the delisting as a story of European infighting rather than a substantive shift in sanctions policy.13France-Latvia feud, EU discord, procedural outcome
European public broadcasters and UK pressEuropeOutlets emphasize Ukrainian objections and the oligarchs' ties to President Putin, framing the delisting as controversial and potentially harmful to the sanctions regime's credibility.567Kyiv's anger, ties to Putin, wrong signal to Moscow, shameful decision
UK and Irish-linked reporting on EU processEuropeCoverage focuses on the mechanics of EU consensus-building, describing the outcome as a difficult compromise reached under deadline pressure despite limited enthusiasm among member states.84unanimity requirement, deadline pressure, difficult compromise, limited support
Independent Russian-focused outletsEuropeCoverage highlights criticism from Russian opposition figures, framing the decision as damaging to anti-corruption efforts and setting a troubling precedent.7opposition criticism, precedent concerns, anti-corruption stance

What the coverage leaves out

  • None of the outlets reviewed explained in detail the legal or evidentiary grounds cited for removing Usmanov and Fridman specifically, as opposed to others remaining on the list.
  • None of the outlets reviewed reported a French or Luxembourgish government statement directly explaining their position on the delisting.
  • None of the outlets reviewed detailed the specific asset or travel restrictions that will be lifted as a result of delisting.

Why it matters

EU sanctions decisions require unanimous approval from all 27 member states, meaning a single country's objection can block or force changes to a package.4

The delisting occurred alongside a three-year rollover of the broader Russia sanctions regime covering nearly 3,000 individuals and entities tied to the war in Ukraine.3489

Sources (9)

Every outlet we drew on, grouped by where it is based. Read the originals for the full reporting.

Get every side of the day's news.

Join the list for our daily briefing, launching soon.