Trump's 'take out LA or San Diego' remark on Iran sparks dispute over meaning
The White House says President Trump was warning about the risk of a nuclear Iran, while Democrats and some Republicans say he suggested Iran could destroy two major American cities. Most outlets reported the remarks as sparking backlash, though at least one outlet described them as a joke.
What happened
At a campaign rally in Grand Island, Nebraska on Monday night, President Trump said, according to multiple outlets quoting the remarks directly, that Iran could 'take out' Los Angeles or San Diego, and that such an outcome would be a 'small price to pay' for safety.1618
California Governor Gavin Newsom and other Democratic leaders condemned the remarks as 'disgusting', 'dangerous' and 'deranged'.6715
The White House denied that Trump was suggesting Iran should attack the cities, with BBC reporting the administration said he was warning about the risk of a nuclear-armed Iran.1415
The remarks also drew criticism from at least one Republican congressional candidate in San Diego, in addition to the broader Democratic backlash.11
What's agreed
Reported consistently by outlets in more than one region.
- Trump, speaking at a campaign rally in Grand Island, Nebraska on Monday night, made remarks suggesting Iran could 'take out' Los Angeles or San Diego.2910121618
- The remarks drew condemnation from California Democratic leaders, including Governor Gavin Newsom.6791011
- The White House pushed back against accusations that Trump was suggesting Iran should attack the cities.14131415
- Some Republicans, including at least one congressional candidate, also criticized or distanced themselves from the remarks.211
Where accounts differ
Each account is attributed to who makes it. We do not judge between them.
What Trump meant by his remarks
Tone of the remarks
Exact wording of Trump's comment
The Jerusalem Post and Anadolu Agency, quoting Trump directly
Trump reportedly said, quote, 'Let 'em take out Los Angeles, let 'em take out San Diego,' calling it a 'small price to pay'.1618
TASS (state-controlled, Russia)
Reported that Trump said the cities 'could be destroyed' amid an Iran war, without detailing exact phrasing or explanation.3
How it's framed
What each perspective puts first, based on headlines and summaries.
| Perspective | How it reads | What it puts first |
|---|---|---|
| US and allied outlets covering domestic political reactionNorth America | Focus heavily on the political fallout within the US, quoting Newsom's strong condemnation and noting rare Republican criticism.711 | Newsom's 'dangerous and deranged' quote, Republican candidate rebuke, midterm election context |
| Middle Eastern outlets, including state-controlled and privately ownedMiddle East & Turkey | Some outlets quoted Trump's remarks directly, including the 'take out' and 'small price to pay' phrasing, while Tehran Times described the comments as demonizing Iran and Al Jazeera described them as a joke.612161718 | direct quotes of 'take out' remarks, framing as anti-Iran rhetoric, framing as a joke |
| Russian state-controlled mediaRussia & Eurasia | TASS reported the remarks briefly and neutrally, emphasizing that Trump did not explain himself, without extensive detail on domestic reaction.3 | lack of explanation from Trump, brief factual framing |
| European public broadcasters and privately owned outletsEurope | BBC and RTÉ present both the White House denial and the backlash, with BBC noting the White House's nuclear-risk explanation alongside Newsom's 'deranged' label.41511 | White House defense, Newsom's reaction, balanced dual framing |
| Asian outlets (South Asia, Southeast Asia, East Asia)South Asia | Outlets emphasize the 'small price to pay' phrasing and backlash, with some syndicating wire copy on the White House denial.8913142 | 'small price to pay' quote, syndicated wire framing, backlash from Democrats and Republicans |
| African privately owned outletsAfrica | Focus on the White House denial and California officials' condemnation, with Egypt Independent providing rally context in Nebraska.110 | White House pushback, California officials calling remarks 'dangerous', rally context |
| Latin American privately owned pressLatin America | Folha de S.Paulo frames the remarks as linked explicitly to Iran's nuclear weapons development and reports political condemnation.5 | nuclear weapons link, political uproar |
What the coverage leaves out
- None of the outlets reviewed provided the full, unedited transcript of Trump's remarks beyond the short quoted excerpts.
- None of the outlets reviewed reported a direct, detailed response from Iranian government officials to Trump's remarks.
- None of the outlets reviewed clarified what specific policy or military context, if any, prompted Trump's comments at the rally.
Why it matters
Newsom, as governor of California, directly oversees the state and said he was directing a state threat response after Trump's comments, which he said targeted two major cities and a naval hub.6
The White House said Trump's remarks were meant to warn about the risks of a nuclear-armed Iran, according to the BBC; Folha de S.Paulo separately framed the remarks as linked to the possibility of Iran developing a nuclear weapon.155
Sources (18)
Every outlet we drew on, grouped by where it is based. Read the originals for the full reporting.
North America
- 7The New York TimesUSPrivate
Fury in California After Trump Suggests Iran Could ‘Take Out’ L.A. or San Diego
Latin America
- 5Folha de S.PauloBRPrivate
Trump says Iran could destroy cities in California and provokes uproar
Translated from Portuguese: Trump diz que Irã poderia destruir cidades da Califórnia e provoca revolta
Europe
- 4RTÉ NewsIEPublic broadcaster
- 11The GuardianGBPrivate
Trump’s suggestion to ‘take out’ LA or San Diego draws Republican rebuke
- 15BBC NewsGBPublic broadcaster
White House defends Trump comment to let Iran 'take out' LA and San Diego
Russia & Eurasia
- 3TASSRUState-controlled
Trump says Los Angeles, San Diego could be destroyed amid Iran war
Middle East & Turkey
- 6The NationalAEPrivate
- 12Tehran TimesIRState-controlled
- 16The Jerusalem PostILPrivate
'Let 'em take out Los Angeles': Trump sparks fury after barb suggesting Iran destroy LA, San Diego
- 17Al Jazeera EnglishQAState-controlled
Trump jokes about letting Iran bomb Los Angeles and San Diego
- 18Anadolu AgencyTRState-controlled
Trump appears to say Iran should be allowed to ‘take out’ Los Angeles and San Diego
Africa
- 1VanguardNGPrivate
White House denies Trump suggested Iran should ‘take out’ US cities
- 10Egypt IndependentEGPrivate
Trump draws backlash after he suggests Iran could ‘take out’ Los Angeles or San Diego
South Asia
- 8The Times of IndiaINPrivate
Trump says Iran taking out LA and San Diego would be 'small price to pay'
- 13The Express TribunePKPrivate
White House denies Trump suggested Iran should 'take out' US cities
East Asia
- 2South China Morning PostHKPrivate
Trump says Iran could ‘take out’ Los Angeles or San Diego, drawing backlash
Southeast Asia
- 9The Straits TimesSGPrivate
Californians blast Trump remark that Iran could ‘take out’ Los Angeles, San Diego
- 14CNASGState-controlled
White House denies Trump suggested Iran should 'take out' US cities