Skip to content
World edition
Analyst Newspaper
Technology · Multi-perspective analysis

Bitget says hackers stole about $350 million in crypto exchange hack

Reports agree hackers stole about $350 million from Bitget's hot wallets, but accounts differ on the exact sum and on who is suspected of carrying out the theft.

Analysis deskEditor Andersson Iyke
5 outlets, 4 regions

What happened

Cryptocurrency exchange Bitget said hackers gained unauthorised access to its hot wallets and stole an amount reported variously as $350 million to $352 million.12345

Bitget suspended or paused withdrawals while it investigates the breach, and said user funds are reportedly safe.124

TechCrunch and CNBC report that North Korean hackers are suspected of carrying out the theft, with CNBC citing Bitget itself as suspecting North Korea's involvement.35

TechCrunch describes the theft as the largest crypto hack so far this year and part of a series of high-profile attacks on the crypto sector.3

What's agreed

Reported consistently by outlets in more than one region.

  • Bitget, a cryptocurrency exchange, said hackers stole roughly $350-352 million from its wallets.12345
  • The exchange suspended or paused withdrawals while investigating the breach.24

Where accounts differ

Each account is attributed to who makes it. We do not judge between them.

Exact amount stolen

Punch and TechCrunch

$351.6 million / $351 million stolen13

RT and CNBC

Nearly $352 million stolen25

CNA

$350 million stolen4

Who is responsible for the hack

TechCrunch, citing suspicion

North Korean hackers are suspected in the theft3

Bitget, via CNBC

Bitget suspects North Korea is responsible for the $352 million hack5

Punch and RT

Reports describe unidentified hackers gaining unauthorised access, without naming a suspected origin12

How it's framed

What each perspective puts first, based on headlines and summaries.

PerspectiveHow it readsWhat it puts first
African private pressAfricaPunch frames the story around the theft figure and reassurance that user funds are safe, without addressing attribution.1theft amount, user funds safe
Russian state-controlled mediaRussia & EurasiaRT emphasizes the scale of the theft and the operational response of suspending withdrawals, without discussing a suspected perpetrator.2theft scale, withdrawal suspension
US private outletsNorth AmericaTechCrunch and CNBC foreground the suspected North Korean origin of the hack and situate it within a broader pattern of crypto sector attacks; TechCrunch's tone is more alarmed, calling it the year's largest hack.35North Korea suspicion, pattern of crypto hacks, scale ranking
Southeast Asian state-controlled mediaSoutheast AsiaCNA focuses narrowly on the operational fact of the theft and the resulting withdrawal pause, without discussing attribution.4withdrawal pause, theft amount

What the coverage leaves out

  • None of the outlets reviewed detail how the hackers gained access to the hot wallets.
  • None of the outlets reviewed report North Korea's response to the suspicion of its involvement.
  • None of the outlets reviewed indicate whether any funds have been recovered or when withdrawals might resume.

Why it matters

TechCrunch reports the theft is the largest crypto hack so far this year, part of a string of high-profile hacks targeting the crypto sector.3

What to watch

  • Whether Bitget or investigators confirm North Korean involvement in the hack.
  • Whether and when Bitget resumes withdrawals.
  • Whether any of the stolen funds are recovered or traced.

Sources (5)

Every outlet we drew on, grouped by where it is based. Read the originals for the full reporting.

Get every side of the day's news.

Join the list for our daily briefing, launching soon.